A lot of people have been posting on the qualities/prereqs for a boyfriend - with these really detailed lists - handholding techniques, movie watching preferences, book reading habits, clothes wearing style etc. I have also elucidated on my list - refer spaces for same. However, what my list says and what I do are completely seperate species - firstly one of the things on the list is good looking [arm candy]- last 2 people me focused on not really in that category - I mean current gamous boy is still acceptable (*pliss to be noting esp @ mallumadness, gamous boy is term for crush) but previous is just not in the vicinity of good looking! Also always thought intelligent/intellectual was a must - the last 3 definitely do not meet that requirement - some of them were just slow!!! Dressing sense is another area people are critical of - I mean as long they are not not wearing clothes a la Salman Khan or marginally better all the primary colors like Govinda, is it really such an issue? exactly last one wore the same clothes every week - I think he had a day coded pattern or something! and as for my primary criteria which would be rich - not even close!
Everybody I know swears that I have the worst taste in men in the planet - it's really an unanimous decision - there is no point in me having a list.....instead of must have, I'm going to try for a must not have!!
Boyfriend type person must not :
- Be married
- Have existing girlfriend
- Be slow
- Own any vehicle that has less than 4 wheels
- Speak any language other than english as main communication language
- Be boring!!
I'm sure people reading this will have loads to add so please feel free!! and @ Brian, this cannot be connected to AFC or MCC!!
3 comments:
My we have changed! But 'be boring' should go - most men are boring you know (at first at least - with time you might get them to stop talking rubbish and get to the real stuff).
YO! finally sense prevailed. i m sure u cant go wrong with this time's formula..!!
this is not connected to MCC...but then chunks is a potential :-p
Post a Comment